At 01:49 PM 1/9/2002 +0000, Nicholas Clark wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 03:16:40AM -0800, Brent Dax wrote:
> > 2) Windows's malloc() isn't as robust as Unix's
>
>In what way? Windows malloc() is getting upset with buggy allocations that
>a Unix malloc() will typically stomach? [ie perl6 bugs]
>or Windows malloc() is getting upset with legal but awkward allocations we're
>asking it for? [ie its bugs that we're going to have to work around]
Looks like the former at the moment. Hard to say for sure without more
investigation.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
