At 11:40 PM +0000 1/30/02, Nicholas Clark wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 06:23:43PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>> We're adding the following:
>>
>> INTVAL get_character(PMC *, INTVAL)
>> INTVAL get_character(PMC *, KEY *, INTVAL)
>>
>> to return the character at position INTVAL in the passed in PMC.
>
>are characters really INTVAL? I have this gut feeling that they ought to
>be UINTVAL. At least, that's my personal world view.
That lets us reserve the negative characters for error conditions. 31
bits should be enough for a long time, even for Unicode.
--
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
