At 8:10 PM -0800 2/23/02, Brent Dax wrote:
>       typedef struct foo_t * FooPtr;
>       typedef struct foo_t FOO;

Y'know, thinking about this, I don't like this trick. That should be 
FOO, and FOO *.

We either typedef the struct, or the pointer to a struct. Not both.
-- 
                                         Dan

--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                         have teddy bears and even
                                       teddy bears get drunk

Reply via email to