Florian La Roche:
> Please do not apply the change for jit/i386/core.jit. The current code
> looks bogus to make a "jmp()". Funny thing is leaving that code away
> does not work, but that "cmp/jne" code seems to make some examples
> work. Probably "JUMP" is completely wrong here??
> --- jit/i386/core.jit
> +++ jit/i386/core.jit
> @@ -83,7 +83,9 @@ Parrot_if_i_ic {
> }
>
> Parrot_branch_ic {
> - jmp ($0x0)
> + cmp %eax,%eax
> + jne ($0x0)
> +; jmp ($0x0)
> JUMP(INT_CONST[1])
> }
Daniel, any comment here?
--
Um. There is no David conspiracy. Definitely not. No Kate conspiracy either.
No. No, there is definitely not any sort of David conspiracy, and we are
definitely *not* in league with the Kate conspiracy. Who doesn't exist. And
nor does the David conspiracy. No. No conspiracies here. - Thorfinn, ASR
