At 4:15 PM -0400 5/29/02, Josh Wilmes wrote:
>At 15:22 on 05/29/2002 EDT, Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I think we'll be safe using longjmp as a C-level exception handler.
>> I'm right now trying to figure whether it's a good thing to do or
>> not. (I'd like to unify C and Parrot level exceptions if I can)
>
>Just make sure that we end up with something portable to be able to build
>a miniparrot with just ANSI C. I assume that's still a design goal.
setjmp and longjmp, for better or worse, are ANSI C, so if we use
them conservatively (which we will) we're fine.
--
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
