David M. Lloyd:
# On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Brent Dax wrote:
#
# > David M. Lloyd:
# > # On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Brent Dax wrote:
# > #
# > # > Er, what patch?
# > #
# > # It was attached because it is 214K. I could resend with
# it # inline
# > if nobody minds the large message body.
# >
# > I don't think anybody minds an attached patch, but I didn't get the
# > attachment.
#
# Outlook users beware: Attachments sent using Pine (my mailer)
# tend to be somewhat invisible to you. They don't appear in
# the message list but they're there. You have to open up the
# message and (I think) click on the paperclip icon to get at
# them. Or something like that.
Double-click on the message and go to File | Save Attachments. Anyway,
the only thing that looks suspect to me is the whole s/BOOLVAL/INTVAL/g
thing.
--Brent Dax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
@roles=map {"Parrot $_"} qw(embedding regexen Configure)
Early in the series, Patrick Stewart came up to us and asked how warp
drive worked. We explained some of the hypothetical principles . . .
"Nonsense," Patrick declared. "All you have to do is say, 'Engage.'"
--Star Trek: The Next Generation Technical Manual
