On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 02:47:01PM -0400, Tanton Gibbs wrote:
>
> The RECALL command automates that so that set_string now looks like:
>
> void set_string( PMC* value ) {
> CHANGE_TYPE( pmc, PerlString );
> RECALL;
> }
>
> will be turned into the correct code shown above. By
> using the RECALL command we get correct semantics
> and no copy and paste bugs.
>
> Does that make sense?
Any chance you could come up with another name? RECALL() to me
immediately suggests 'recall', not 're-call'. REINVOKE()?
DOITOVERAGAINBUTDOITRIGHTTHISTIME()? RE_CALL()? CHAIN()?
