On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> You can do that:
> .sub __main__
> bsr _main
> end
> .end
> .sub _main
...
> So you have just to emit code, to call your real main at the beginning.
Well that worked, and even let me get rid of the
endsub label:
.sub __start__
call __main__
.end
.sub __main__
.sub _f
print ":)"
ret
.end
$I0 = addr _f
print $I0
end
.end
That prints ":)", followed by the address,
which is what I wnat. I can't seem to duplicate
the problem I was having now, but somehow last
night, if I commented out the "addr" line, the
_f sub wouldn't run. In other words, it was like
the addr call was actually invoking the routine.
Maybe I was just tired. :)
> You could also have a look at docs/calling_conventions.pod, which
> currently is being implemented.
Thanks. I hadn't seen the pdd version.
I was going off the other version in imcc/docs
[ in pirate, not in this example :) ]
> > Incidentally, I spent all day working on pirate,
> > and it now generates (and runs!) code for a bunch
> > of python structures:
>
> Wow.
Actually, between imcc and the python compiler
module, it's not nearly as hard as I thought it
would be. So far, I think the parrot version is
actually a lot simpler than the python compiler,
just because imcc is doing so much of the work.
Sincerely,
Michal J Wallace
Sabren Enterprises, Inc.
-------------------------------------
contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hosting: http://www.cornerhost.com/
my site: http://www.withoutane.com/
--------------------------------------
