On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 10:35:56AM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 01:49:05AM -0400, David H. Adler wrote:
> > I'm sure it needs a few tweaks, but I've managed to write a hq9+
> > interpreter in pasm.
>
> > Any thoughts on this?
>
> + isn't a portable file name character is it?
> So although Unix (and CVS) will be quite happy, it would not be a great
> idea naming a subdirectory hq9+ ?
>
> What should we call it
hq9p, same as the .pasm file.
PS I think READ needs s/S1/S5/ if I'm reading it correctly. Otherwise
everything after the 1024th character will be ignored, and then you
couldn't write Enterprise Level hq9+ programs!
--
Quit looking, kids! It'll EAT YOUR MIND!!
-- http://www.angryflower.com/fuck.gif
