On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > This would give us one additional pointer. > > Comments welcome
Go for it. This won't increase the size of the struct, so I can't think of a good reason to not do it. Dan
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > This would give us one additional pointer. > > Comments welcome
Go for it. This won't increase the size of the struct, so I can't think of a good reason to not do it. Dan