Melvin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The 2nd version of newsub implicitly sets P0 and P1, but they > are not part of the instruction.
Yeah. But we really have a lot more of such instructions: invoke or stack.ops for example. > or IMCC has to track implicit registers. cfg.c:109 in my tree. invoke and invokecc are handled there too. > I know the calling convention says P0/P1, but what do we gain > by hiding it at the PASM level when we can hide it with IMCC? The 4 argument form of newsub isn't really needed, that's right. > -Melvin leo
