On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Melvin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Add check for 0 arguments in PCC subs to skip code generate for
> > proto/nonproto
> > argument checking if there are no args. (Leo check this if it is the right
> > thing to do?)
>
> Looks good, but might not be compliant with Dan's runtime check
> philosophy. Or, its ok for the "we don't check" case and not for the
> paranoid one.
Nope, it's fine -- while we need to provide the information to make the
checks, nobody's obligated to make them. (Though I would like there to be
a means for subs declared in IMCC to validate their parameters against
what they expect)
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
