Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A few more mod ops
> +=item B<cmod>(out PMC, in INT, in INT)
I'm not sure if this is a good idea. We currently don't have any such
kind of ops that takes 2 natural types and spits out a new PMC
BTW, the doc above has out PMC, the implementation is:
> +op cmod(in PMC, in INT, in INT) {
so that's b0rken anyway.
But implementing *one* such opcode (cmod) implies that we have it for
all math ops for symmetry reasons.
A further note: while its safe to add opcodes w/o updating ops.num, the
next adding of unregistered ops might break the ops numbering (and
existing PBCs), so its not really recommended ;)
leo
