Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Piers Cawley wrote: > >> Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>>At (1) the continuation is marked with C<dont_cache_retc>. In C<save_context> >>>this flag is propagated to the stacks in the continuation's context. At >>>(2) or any other place, where this stacks are popped off, the stack >>>chunks are not put onto the stack chunk freelist. >>> >> That seems to make sense. > > And it works (for your code) > > Here is a proof of concept patchoid:
Fabulous > > 1) change to your example code: > $P1 = clone P1 > store_lex 1, "cc", $P1 > (the clone strips off all recycle flags) Oh nice, much neater than what I was thinking of involving making a 'real' continuation and copying context info across from the return continuation. Does this pretty much remove the last distinction between RetContinuation and Continuation?
