On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 09:18, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Ah. Relikt of Jeff's patch. If that constant got reused elsewhere, e.g.
> as a method name, it were one too short.
Confirmed. Thanks, Leo!
Would a test patch such as the following be good to catch regressions,
or should it go elsewhere? If elsewhere, do you prefer a separate test
in object-meths.t or somewhere in imcc/t?
-- c
Index: t/pmc/object-meths.t
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/public/parrot/t/pmc/object-meths.t,v
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -u -r1.17 object-meths.t
--- t/pmc/object-meths.t 10 Apr 2004 12:50:23 -0000 1.17
+++ t/pmc/object-meths.t 15 Apr 2004 16:54:04 -0000
@@ -428,7 +428,7 @@
find_type I0, "Foo"
new P2, I0
- set S0, "meth"
+ set S0, 'meth'
fetchmethod P0, P2, S0
print "main\n"
# P2, S0 are as in callmethod
