At 4:07 PM +0200 4/27/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

 So, are we otherwise set on the plan, such that it can be implemented
 and we can work on some of the parts that haven't been specified?

Some syntax glue for PASM/PIR is needed. How do I specify enoding/charset/language. The same holds for IO. We have to first get various strings in and out to test implementation.

We need a default fallback behavior in the absence of ICU code too.

WRT char/code point/grapheme/character/glyph a glossary *with* examples
would really be helpful.

I'll add in all these in a second draft. I don't think any of them alter the semantics or design, though, so I'll take 'em in parallel.
--
Dan


--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                         have teddy bears and even
                                      teddy bears get drunk

Reply via email to