--- Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Joshua Gatcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> I had submitted a patch some time ago that never
got
>> applied enabling tests for threads, timer, and
>> extend_13.....
> Overlooked? Please rediff and resend.
I will do - likely tomorrow.
> > It says at the bottom that the output could appear
> > in reversed order and so I am guessing the sleep
> > statement is to ensure that it comes out in the
> > proper order.
> The "sleep" is of course a hack only and wrong. The
> real thing todo is to convert the test result into a
> regexp that allows both orderings.
I agree, but that doesn't explain why only 1 of the
two messages is displayed to the screen when the sleep
statement is present. I don't want to brush a bug
under the rug. If one thread finishes before the
other thread gets to a print statement, the print does
not appear on the screen at all.
> leo
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
