Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are we comfortable adding the dynclasses to the default build target?
I think it can go in.
> I want to at some point, if only to make really sure that we don't
> break them. (As stuff that gets built and tested by default stays up
> to date, while the rest... tends not to)
Good point. We need tests:
1) basic operation: is dynclass loading working (current samples,
modified not to use absolute type numbers)
2) Where should dynamic {tcl, perl, python, ...}_classes tests go?
t/xt/$lang # xt for extension and test sorting?
leo
