Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 10:34:17AM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>> 1) Almost half of the non-PMC compare and branch opcodes according to: >> >> lt a, b, L1 => ge b, a, L1 *g* > I read this and thought of a subtle problem. So I tried some code, and I > surprised myself. I don't think that your logic is correct: Yes. Thanks. I mixed that up with "not (a < b)" which is a bit different. > After experimenting, I think that it should be > lt a, b, L1 => gt b, a, L1 Yep. And that's in CVS already, just the other direction. > If I'm right, then this doesn't say good things about the completeness of > our regression tests. A lot of tests were failing, when I had it wrong. That's fine. > Nicholas Clark leo
