On Nov 28, 2004, at 4:58 AM, Herbert Snorrason wrote:
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 21:49:49 -0500, Michael G Schwern
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 09:58:44PM +0000, Herbert Snorrason wrote:
It should. EcmaScript is also a relatively small language, which
would
work strongly in its advantage...
A 188 page language spec is small? ;)
ECMA-262, ECMAScript Language Specification: 172 pages.
ECMA-334, C# Language Specification: 448 pages.
ISO 1539-1, Fortran Part 1, Base language: 567 pages.
ISO 1989, COBOL: 859 pages.
ISO 9899, C: 538 pages.
ISO 14882, C++: 757 pages.
Yes, it is. :)
You cheated:
Revised^5 Report on the Algorithmic Language Scheme: 50 pages.
But still, small by comparison with most. :)
JEff
