On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 16:59:48 +0100, Stéphane Payrard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 01:34:57AM -0800, Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon wrote: > > Cameron Zemek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think that "oddball control flow constructs" like closures are > proper to dynamic languages. For example, OCAML (another camel related > language :) relies on type inference at compile time so is by nature a > statically typed language. It supports closure and exceptions. I don't > know about continuations, coroutines. You can have coroutines with threading, and even general continuations should be possible as well [1].
Cheers, Michael [1] call/cc for Ocaml: http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~balat/tdpe-popl04.php
