On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 09:52:34PM -0500, Bob Rogers wrote: Content-Description: message body text > The good news is that the attached patch makes this work. The bad > news is that it also breaks PGE, albeit in a small way. Six of the > "<after>" tests (mostly, but not exclusively, involving "<!after>") in > t/compilers/pge/p6rules/builtins.t seem to go into an infinite loop. I > have been unable to figure this out, so I'm hoping it will be easy for > someone who understands PGE. (Maybe there's something in PGE that > assumes that returning from a sub restores the state of the user stack?) > When (and if) that happens, we can decide whether this patch is worth > doing. TIA,
I'll take a look and see if I can figure out what's going on from the PGE side. Pm
