On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:49:54AM +0100, Klaas-Jan Stol wrote: > hello, > > It was discussed before, but I'm not sure what was the result; PAST-pm > only allows a PAST::Block node to be returned from transform (ROOT). > However, in languages/PIR, the top level construct is a compilation > unit, which may be an include statement. An include statement should not > be enclosed by a subroutine. > > Will PAST-pm be able to handle this?
Yes, I'm expecting that PAST-pm either will have a PAST::CompUnit node type for compilation units, or the 'blocktype' attribute on PAST::Block will have a 'compunit' setting. Pm
