On Friday 11 May 2007 19:01:51 James Keenan wrote: > I googled the archives of our mailing list and found no matches for > 'pod_todo'. So apparently there was no on-list discussion of this > test before it was committed to trunk. Given how many files it finds > defective, shouldn't there have been some discussion -- or at least > some warning -- before it was committed?
I agree. It may be a decent test, but it's not a test to run by default right now. While I'm asking for a pony, I'd also like a way to disable the coding standards tests for an official release tarball. -- c
