Paul Cochrane wrote:
'rpath' sounds pretty general to me (if not particularly
self-documenting). Is there really a significant bang for the buck to
changing it? (Or, different way of asking same question: If that
comment weren't there, would we care?)
Put simply: I don't think so. I'm in the process of (slowly, and
eventually) converting all the todo items in the perl source across to
RT tickets. This has the dual purpose of us checking corners of the
code which might be a bit dusty and cleaning the code up a bit. If we
don't need the comment, we can just delete it and resolve the ticket.
Perhaps you could run 'svn blame' on that comment, determine who wrote
it and contact her/him to see if anything has come of it.
kid51
