On Jun 12, 2007, at 9:38 AM, jerry gay wrote:
now, to the matter at hand: i agree with andy. we shouldn't revert this because one broken compiler doesn't like it. however, we should make it clear in the documentation that the particular version of that compiler has trouble compiling valid C89, will not compile parrot, and upgrading to a version with the proper patch is required.
It shouldn't be too tough to drop a #pragma once in the sample program that Configure.pl uses to check validity of the compiler, no?
-- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
