Paul Cochrane wrote:
On 14/08/07, Joshua Hoblitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why not just pull Slurp or File::Slurp into the tree? Yes, writing a
slurp function is trivial but (bare with me here) if it's non-trivial
enough to be factored out into a module then it should be non-trivial
enough to not re-invent the wheel.
Agreed. Why not just make it part of Bundle::Parrot?
To be honest, this is the first that I've heard of Bundle::Parrot. I
cannot locate any postings to the mailing list since last November
containing 'Bundle' in its subject line.
But the fact that I've been able to work on Parrot since last November
*without* having installed Bundle::Parrot indicates that we make some
distinction between that non-core Perl 5 functionality we want *in* the
Parrot distribution and that which is found in Bundle::Parrot.
Could you clarify how that distinction is made?
kid51
