Yes,

I think so. However, I rather ran into a complicated situation. In that
particular place, in one mode, arg was used and in another arg wasn't.
According to the present situation, we have two options.

1. The patch I proposed (which is logically correct)
2. Changing arg to ARGIN, and just making a dummy call on it, just to make
sure it is used

Regards,
Senaka


On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 6:28 AM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Monday 31 March 2008 14:10:13 Senaka Fernando wrote:
>
> > There is a build failure when using the configure option --gc=libc. The
> > attached patch solves this issue.
>
> Thanks, applied with a corresponding header tweak as r26678.
>
> Ultimately we're better off unifying the API so that the function
> signatures
> are completely the same between the two invocations, but it's okay to make
> it
> compile now and clean it up shortly.
>
> -- c
>

Reply via email to