On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 10:25:17AM -0700, chromatic wrote: > On Thursday 29 May 2008 08:45:26 Will Coleda wrote: > > > Even if there is disagreement on whether the opcode itself should be > > removed, there appears to be consensus that the tests need to be > > removed. We can always do that first to deal with the tickets relating > > to that, and then discuss the merits of having the opcode in parrot > > after that. > > There are more than a few other opcodes which serve as examples. If people > copy this particular one, they'll have at least one blatant bug. Let's > remove it.
+1 Pm
