On Wed Jul 02 09:17:44 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed Jul 02 06:25:14 2008, particle wrote: > > > > therefore, in an attempt to keep bytecode compatible across versions > > of parrot, opcodes can never be deleted. instead, if opcodes are > > deprecated, their function bodies should throw an exception explaining > > that the opcode is no longer supported. > > > > What purpose remains, then, for either tools/dev/ops_renum.mak or my > alternative, tools/dev/opsrenumber.pl? Is such a program only intended > to provide a number for newly added opcodes? > >
Still hoping for some feedback on the question above. Thanks. kid51
