jerry gay wrote:
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 1:09 AM, Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
a) Do abstract base classes as currently implemented in Parrot serve any
useful purpose? If not, eliminate them.
can they be replaced by roles?
Potentially, yes. In the case of the scalar PMC it would make quite a
bit of sense as a role (composing in behavior common to scalar data
types). For the default PMC it makes less sense. But then, I can see
some argument there that default shouldn't be a PMC at all.
Allison
