On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 1:43 AM, via RT Stephane Payrard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This results in 4 stat()s per pbc. > opening the file and using Parrot_fstat_info_intval() instead of > Parrot_stat_info_intval() will be less costly. > this means retooling readbc() that now stats the file to verify it can open > it. I think will be faster and cleaner to have a function that takes a file handler. That way the search functions can just try to open a file instead of doing stat call for any directory in the search paths, and then pass a file path to do even more stat on it. -- Salu2
