On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 08:04:41PM -0700, Allison Randal wrote: >> >> I don't understand the problem. Is it that you expect 'rethrow' to keep >> the stack trace of the original 'die'? > > ...this is what I would expect. If I catch and then rethrow an > exception, I'd expect the stack trace to continue to show the > location of the original throw, not the location of the > rethrow.
I agree. Otherwise, what's the point of 'rethrow'? -- Mark J. Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
