I really understand your point. If there was several competing OOP modules, 
things *could* get really complicated (in my opinion, it isn't the case for 
perl 5, but it is worth discussing), but it doesn't seem as if anyone has put 
any effort into defining what needs to be common and what doesn't. 

Seriously, do you believe that the hyperoperators address the problem, you're 
referring to?

Regards, 

Michael. 

---- Paweł Murias wrote ----

>The goal is to avoid everyone using a different not fully compatible version 
>of everything. Like in perl 5 with the bunch of different ways to do objects, 
>signatures etc. 
>
>Pilling good things on top of each others rather than aiming for an elegant 
>design is what I consider the core idea of Perl.
>
>Being able to add language features removes most benefits of a simple design 
>(easy to create tool support).
>
>
>On 16 June 2015 at 21:08, Fields, Christopher J <cjfie...@illinois.edu> wrote:
>
>I like that I can start with a fairly simple subset of Perl 6 but pick up more 
>as I go along, if it’s needed.
>
>
>chris
>
>
>On Jun 16, 2015, at 9:45 AM, Paweł Murias <pawelmur...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>I think Perl 6 tries to include too much rather than too little. 
>
>It will be possible to just use a subset 
>
>
>On 16 June 2015 at 10:32, Michael Zedeler <mich...@zedeler.dk> wrote:
>
>On 06/12/15 15:54, Parrot Raiser wrote:
>
>Has somebody been following the discussions on types? http://xkcd.org/1537/ 
>:-)*
>
>Perl6 has something similar to example 9.
>
>Ranges, hyper-operators as well as the "invocation" operators .+ and .* 
>doesn't make any sense to me. Those constructs made me stop using Perl and 
>look elsewhere. It was a hard decision since I've used the language for at 
>least 15 years.
>
>I hope Perl6 regexes will make it far beyond Perl itself and the notion of 
>being able to introduce custom dsl parsed on equal terms as the rest of Perl 6 
>is really sweet.
>
>Regards,
>
>Michael.
>
>-- 
>Michael Zedeler
>70 25 19 99
>mich...@zedeler.dk
>
>dk.linkedin.com/in/mzedeler | twitter.com/mzedeler | github.com/mzedeler
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to