"David L. Nicol" wrote:
>
> @a["@{\(getindices())}"];
> @a[join $",$r->get_x, $r->get_y];
My point exactly by these statements:
> > Either of these could return an arrayref, but forcing quotes around them
> > means you'll need inbetweener variables or the @{} construct, neither of
> > which is really gracious.
Personally, I think this is really gross. I don't think array indices
are something that we should have to go to such lengths to get. I'd
rather have a somewhat-confusing ; or , based syntax than the above. If
anything that's *more* confusing and harder to read.
-Nate
- Re: Designing Perl 6 data crunching (wa... Baris
- Re: Designing Perl 6 data crunching (wa... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Designing Perl 6 data crunching (wa... Christian Soeller
- Re: Designing Perl 6 data crunching (wa... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: n-dim matrices Baris
- a syntax derived from constant-time hash-based ... David L. Nicol
- Re: a syntax derived from constant-time has... Nathan Wiger
- Re: a syntax derived from constant-time... David L. Nicol
- Re: a syntax derived from constant-time... Nathan Wiger
- Re: a syntax derived from constant-time... David L. Nicol
- Re: a syntax derived from constant-time... Nathan Wiger
- Re: a syntax derived from constant-time... David L. Nicol
- Re: a syntax derived from constant-time... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: a syntax derived from constant-time... c . soeller
- Re: n-dim matrices Karl Glazebrook
- Re: n-dim matrices Buddha Buck
- Re: n-dim matrices Karl Glazebrook
- Re: n-dim matrices Buddha Buck
- Re: n-dim matrices Christian Soeller
- Re: n-dim matrices Buddha Buck
- Re: n-dim matrices Christian Soeller
