>>>>> "CF" == Chaim Frenkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
CF> I think you should break this up into two.
CF> One is multiple timers. The other is how AIO uses the timers.
but the arguments and api and callbacks are identical. i want to
highlight that consistancy. and it is short enough to be one rfc.
CF> The need for timers is independent of AIO.
no totally. i don't see any easy way to support multiple timers without
loading in some parts of AIO. and yes, that is implementation but i see
those things as i design the language level stuff and i can't hide from
it. you would get multiple timers only if you get AIO as i am descibing it.
also if you are timed out of an async I/O call in an eval block and you
die in the callback that would be very similar to the simple timer
breaking out.
uri
--
Uri Guttman --------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------- http://www.sysarch.com
SYStems ARCHitecture, Software Engineering, Perl, Internet, UNIX Consulting
The Perl Books Page ----------- http://www.sysarch.com/cgi-bin/perl_books
The Best Search Engine on the Net ---------- http://www.northernlight.com
