"Christopher J. Madsen" wrote: > foreach $item $index (@array) { > print $item, " is at index ", $index, "\n"; > } That's useful syntax, but I'd rather it mean stepping pair-wise through @array. Then we could scan through a hash with foreach $key $value (%hash) { ... } (Hashes are flattened in array context.) Somebody proposed a trailing index instead: foreach $value (@array) $index { ... } That's short and simple and doesn't conflict. The proposal for using each(), keys() and values() on arrays was nice too. IMHO, since all of these things make sense and work together nicely, I'd like to have them all. - Ken
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in for st... Christopher J. Madsen
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in fo... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter i... Christopher J. Madsen
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit coun... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit ... Christopher J. Madsen
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit coun... Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit ... Mike Pastore
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit ... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit ... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit ... Buddha Buck
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in for statem... Ken Fox
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in for st... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in fo... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in for statements,... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in for statements,... Steve Simmons
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in for statem... John McNamara
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in for st... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in fo... John McNamara
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in for st... Steve Simmons
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in for st... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in fo... Jonathan Scott Duff