On Wed, 16 Aug 2000 07:39:33 -0700 (PDT), Dave Storrs wrote: > The idea of having two different regex "languages" in Perl makes >me very, very nervous. Potential for confusion It should. However, I was talking about two different rgex implementations, not two different languages. I would make the notation the same for both. Except: there are things that you generally can't do with a DFA, such as capturing submatches, and repeated matches like /(['"]).*?\1/ (--> the "\1"). I think that's about it. And the DFA would only be used for input line terminator scans. No user choice. -- Bart.
- RFC 69 (v3) Standardize input record separator (for Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 69 (v3) Standardize input record separato... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 69 (v3) Standardize input record separato... Bryan C . Warnock
- Line disciplines (was Re: RFC 69 (v3) Standar... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Line disciplines (was Re: RFC 69 (v3)... hao
- Re: Line disciplines (was Re: RFC 69 ... Bart Lateur
- Re: Line disciplines (was Re: RF... Dave Storrs
- Re: Line disciplines (was Re... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Line disciplines (wa... Simply Hao
- Re: Line disciplines (wa... Dave Storrs
- Re: Line disciplines (was Re... Bart Lateur
- Re: Line disciplines (wa... Dave Storrs
- Re: Line disciplines (wa... James Mastros