On Wed, 16 Aug 2000 07:39:33 -0700 (PDT), Dave Storrs wrote:
> The idea of having two different regex "languages" in Perl makes
>me very, very nervous. Potential for confusion
It should.
However, I was talking about two different rgex implementations, not two
different languages. I would make the notation the same for both.
Except: there are things that you generally can't do with a DFA, such as
capturing submatches, and repeated matches like
/(['"]).*?\1/
(--> the "\1"). I think that's about it.
And the DFA would only be used for input line terminator scans. No user
choice.
--
Bart.
- RFC 69 (v3) Standardize input record separator (for Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 69 (v3) Standardize input record separato... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 69 (v3) Standardize input record separato... Bryan C . Warnock
- Line disciplines (was Re: RFC 69 (v3) Standar... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Line disciplines (was Re: RFC 69 (v3)... hao
- Re: Line disciplines (was Re: RFC 69 ... Bart Lateur
- Re: Line disciplines (was Re: RF... Dave Storrs
- Re: Line disciplines (was Re... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Line disciplines (wa... Simply Hao
- Re: Line disciplines (wa... Dave Storrs
- Re: Line disciplines (was Re... Bart Lateur
- Re: Line disciplines (wa... Dave Storrs
- Re: Line disciplines (wa... James Mastros
