On Fri, 8 Sep 2000 01:18:19 -0700 (PDT), Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote: >I really don't understand why you want to have what's printed. It is handy, sometimes. But I do think that the overhead of creating a longish string every time you print something, which is then simply discarded, is not really acceptable. I expect a rather significant slowdown. A rough guess: 20%, which that is the slowdown I onotice if you print with $\ set to "\n" instead of to nothing. It's just not worth it. -- Bart.
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should have a print operator Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should have a print operator Jon Ericson
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should have a print oper... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should have a print ... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should have a pr... Jon Ericson
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should have... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should have a pr... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should have... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should ... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should ... Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should ... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should ... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should ... Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should ... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should have a print ... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should have a print oper... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should have a print ... Jon Ericson
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should have a pr... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should have a print operator Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should have a print operator Jon Ericson
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should have a print oper... Peter Scott