Tom Christiansen wrote: > > >Scalars hold references to objects. Filehandles should, ultimately, > >be objects, as should directory handles. > > I haven't yet seen anybody yet propose bifurcating {file,directory}handles. > This would certainly be nice. If I'm understanding what you mean, I believe RFC 14 discusses this, as does RFC 239, but this could be expanded if it is unclear. Perhaps just a separate RFC on file/dir handles is in order. -Nate
- Re: RFC 30 (v4) STDIN, STDOUT, STDERR, ARGV, and DATA sho... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 30 (v4) STDIN, STDOUT, STDERR, ARGV, and DAT... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 30 (v4) STDIN, STDOUT, STDERR, ARGV, and... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 30 (v4) STDIN, STDOUT, STDERR, ARGV,... Jon Ericson
- Re: RFC 30 (v4) STDIN, STDOUT, STDERR, A... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 30 (v4) STDIN, STDOUT, STDERR, ARGV,... Eryq
- Re: RFC 30 (v4) STDIN, STDOUT, STDERR, A... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 30 (v4) STDIN, STDOUT, STDERR, ARGV,... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 30 (v4) STDIN, STDOUT, STDERR, ARGV, and DAT... Eryq
- Re: RFC 30 (v4) STDIN, STDOUT, STDERR, ARGV, and... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 30 (v4) STDIN, STDOUT, STDERR, ARGV,... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 30 (v4) STDIN, STDOUT, STDERR, ARGV,... Eryq
- Re: RFC 30 (v4) STDIN, STDOUT, STDERR, A... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 30 (v4) STDIN, STDOUT, STDE... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 30 (v4) STDIN, STDOUT, STDERR, A... David L. Nicol