Piers Cawley wrote:
> > In my opinion the contents of $ME should allow to determine wether it was
> > called as a procedure or as a method, the easiest way to do that is undef
> > for procedure, object for method and classname for class methods.
>
> Procedure reference for a procedure call please. It makes for some
> nice wins with anonymous subroutines...
Recursion would become possible in anonymous subroutines. That seems
like it would warrant its own reserved magic variable, perhaps &ME which would
mean that in any setting, \&ME for a reference to it.
