On Wed, Aug 23, 2000 at 12:45:06PM -0500, David L. Nicol wrote: > with %container { > ->$fieldname = $value; > ${->destinationvaluename} = ->value_to_put_there > } Then I'd've expected that to have been: with \%container { ->{$fieldname} = $value; ${->{destinationvaluename} = ->{value_to_put_there}; } And that's just too much punctuation for too little value. How special purpose is "with"? Do people envision using it *only* on hashes? (I did until this email) If so, I like Damian's version best: http://www.mail-archive.com/perl6-language@perl.org/msg02649.html -Scott -- Jonathan Scott Duff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: PROTOPROPOSAL FOR NEW BACKSLASH was Re: implied pa... Markus Peter
- Re: PROTOPROPOSAL FOR NEW BACKSLASH was Re: impli... Nathan Torkington
- Re: PROTOPROPOSAL FOR NEW BACKSLASH was Re: i... David L. Nicol
- Re: PROTOPROPOSAL FOR NEW BACKSLASH was R... Markus Peter
- Re: PROTOPROPOSAL FOR NEW BACKSLASH was R... Nathan Torkington
- Re: PROTOPROPOSAL FOR NEW BACKSLASH w... David L. Nicol
- Re: PROTOPROPOSAL FOR NEW BACKSL... Michael Fowler
- Re: PROTOPROPOSAL FOR NEW BACKSL... Nathan Torkington
- Re: PROTOPROPOSAL FOR NEW BA... David L. Nicol
- Re: PROTOPROPOSAL FOR NE... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: PROTOPROPOSAL FOR NE... Damian Conway
- Re: PROTOPROPOSAL FOR NEW BACKSLASH was R... Markus Peter
- Re: PROTOPROPOSAL FOR NEW BACKSLASH w... Bart Lateur
- Re: PROTOPROPOSAL FOR NEW BACKSLASH was Re: i... Bart Lateur
- Re: PROTOPROPOSAL FOR NEW BACKSLASH was R... Randal L. Schwartz