-----Original Message-----
From: Bart Lateur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2000 7:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PROTOPROPOSAL FOR NEW BACKSLASH was Re: implied pascal-like
"with" or "express"
On Tue, 22 Aug 2000 00:03:48 -0600 (MDT), Nathan Torkington wrote:
>Normally what you'd say is:
>
> with (%record) {
> ....
> }
>
>(look at me, using Larry's new ... operator :-)
No you didn't. You typed four dots.
--
Bart.
Hmmm
... . ...;
or maybe:
while (... .. ...) {
q(can't touch this!)
}
-Corwin
