Damian Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >BTW, this is not just theoretical yearnings. I have written three modules >in the past year that do not work as well as they could, simply because it >is not possible to overload && and ||. > >Damian I have one too. -- Nick Ing-Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Via, but not speaking for: Texas Instruments Ltd.
- Re: RFC 159 (v1) True Polymorphic Objects Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 159 (v1) True Polymorphic Objects Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 159 (v1) True Polymorphic Objects Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 159 (v1) True Polymorphic Objects Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 159 (v1) True Polymorphic Objects Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 159 (v1) True Polymorphic Objects Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 159 (v1) True Polymorphic Objects Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 159 (v1) True Polymorphic Objects Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 159 (v1) True Polymorphic Objects Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 159 (v1) True Polymorphic Objects Bennett Todd
- Nick Ing-Simmons