Re: RFC 171 (v1) my Dog $spot should call a constructor implicitly

[Piers Cawley]

Hildo Biersma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Many people see even this as a bad choice, saying that 'explicit' should
> be the default, and that C++ constructors should be marked 'implicit'
> for this behavior to be allowed.

Hmmm... having 'explicit' be implicit and vice versa? I think my head
may be about to start spinning. Thank ghod I don't do C++.

-- 
Piers