Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and methods

[Damian Conway]

   > >That seems reasonable--except that I don't believe exists() merits
   > >any special treatment.  
   > 
   > More specifically, I think all non-lvalue context use of -> should be 
   > non-autoviv, whether exists or anything else.

I agree entirely.

In fact, I shall extend RFC 128 to allow subroutine parameter to specify
that they are non-autovivifying.

Damian