> > my $weather = new Schwern::Example; > > print "Today's weather will be $weather->{temp} degrees and sunny."; > > print "And tomorrow we'll be expecting ", $weather->forecast; > > You are wicked and wrong to have broken inside and peeked at the > implementation and then relied upon it. I think the issue is: *what* tempted them to be so wicked and wrong. It is the fact that iniquitous direct access interpolated easily, whereas virtuous accessor access didn't. Perhaps this RFC should be subtitled: "Ne nos inducas in tentationem..." :-) Damian
- Re: RFC - Interpolation of met... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC - Interpolation of method ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC - Interpolation of met... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC - Interpolation of met... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC - Interpolation of met... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC - Interpolation of met... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC - Interpolation of met... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC - Interpolation of method calls Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC - Interpolation of method calls Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC - Interpolation of method calls Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC - Interpolation of method calls Damian Conway
- Re: RFC - Interpolation of method calls John Siracusa
- Re: RFC - Interpolation of method calls Michael G Schwern