On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 09:48:27AM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
> Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Nope. fields::new() basically just does C<bless
> > [\%{"$class\::FIELDS"}], $class>, but the current pseudohash
> > implementation doesn't care if something is an object or not. It just
> > cares about either A) its type or B) what's in $ph->[0].
>
> Hmm... it still feels like undocumented behaviour. I'd definitely be
> inclined to tighten up the base/fields behaviour. My feeling is that
> the proposal makes them closer to the Right Thing.
Its plenty documented. But if we simply put a bullet into
pseudo-hashes, as per RFC 241, this all goes away.
--
Michael G Schwern http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just Another Stupid Consultant Perl6 Kwalitee Ashuranse
But why? It's such a well designed cesspool of C++ code. Why wouldn't
you want to hack mozilla?
-- Ziggy
