> The mythical (and insistent) 'in' operator to rescue? I don't think so. "In" doesn't mean "matches". > $pattern in @expr any(@expr) =~ $pattern all(@expr) =~ $pattern > @pattern in $expr $expr =~ any(@pattern) $expr =~ all(@pattern) > @pattern in @expr any(@expr) =~ any(@pattern) any(@expr) =~ all(@pattern) all(@expr) =~ any(@pattern) all(@expr) =~ all(@pattern) > Should I put down the keyboard now? That's right, citizen. Now back away slowly... Damian
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminate =~ operator. Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminate =~ operator. Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminate =~ operator. Larry Wall
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminate =~ operator. Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminate =~ operator... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminate =~ operator... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminate =~ operator. Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminate =~ operator... Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminate =~ ope... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminate =~ operator... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminate =~ ope... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminate =~... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminat... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminat... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminat... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminate =~ operator. Mark-Jason Dominus