>> > next if /\s+/ || /\w+/; next if match /\s+/ or match /\w+/; >> >> Gosh this is annoying. I *really* don't want to have to type "match" >> all the time. And now I have to use C<or> rather than C<||>, which is >> already ingrained in my head (I rarely use "or" or "and") There are thirteen years of precedent, not to mention the millions of users, who are completely accustomed to writing expressions like next if /\s+/ || /\w+/; It's nearly part of Perl's language signature. I wouldn't count on this going away if you still think to call this "Perl". It is of course much more likely in the renamed "Frob" language, however. --tom
- RFC 164 (v1) Replace =~, !~, m//, and s/// with match(... Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 164 (v1) Replace =~, !~, m//, and s/// wi... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 164 (v1) Replace =~, !~, m//, and s/// wi... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 164 (v1) Replace =~, !~, m//, and s//... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 164 (v1) Replace =~, !~, m//, and... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 164 (v1) Replace =~, !~, m//,... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 164 (v1) Replace =~, !~, m//, and s/// wi... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 164 (v1) Replace =~, !~, m//, and s//... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 164 (v1) Replace =~, !~, m//, and... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 164 (v1) Replace =~, !~, m//, and... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 164 (v1) Replace =~, !~, m//,... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 164 (v1) Replace =~, !~,... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 164 (v1) Replace =~,... Richard Proctor
- Re: RFC 164 (v1) Replace... Michael Maraist
- Re: RFC 164 (v1) Replace... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 164 (v1) Replace... Michael Maraist
- Re: RFC 164 (v1) Replace... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 164 (v1) Replace... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 164 (v1) Replace... Nathan Torkington
- Creating Perl 6, not Per... Nathan Wiger